The canon · Inventory · AIS-2.2

For each AI system, state whether it affects a consumer outcome, who made that determination, and on what basis.

This is one of the twenty-five questions a carrier reviewer sends a vendor, in the words an examiner uses. Below it: the answers that make a reviewer stop on this item, derived by running Vaulith's rules engine on an estate that gets everything wrong, and the free questions that reach it.

What stops a reviewer here

One finding reaches this item.

Will escalateR-CONTRADICTION-IMPACT · blocks this item

Your policy commits to a recorded impact determination that is missing

AI policy (3.4) commits to determining and recording the consumer impact of every system. MDL-001 Claims triage has no recorded determination. The determination is the first thing an examiner asks for on any system, because it decides which questions apply to it, and a policy that promises the record makes its absence a governance failure rather than a paperwork gap.

To fix: Write the determination for each system, have it approved by whoever owns the policy, and keep it with the model record. One page per system is enough.

How it is scored

Credit per verdict, times the weight.

A critical item carries weight 3. A pass earns 1.00 of it, a questioned answer 0.60, an escalated one 0.20 and a stop 0.00. An unanswered item earns nothing and still takes the citation penalty, so a profile cannot be improved by leaving an inconvenient question blank. The whole arithmetic is shown on the homepage and in every assessment.